Steve Curran Wonders About UV for Leica 100-400mm lens
I’ve been reading your articles on the Leica 100-400mm lens over the past few days. Super informative by the way!
I recently picked one up and decided on put a UV filter on it for protection. I noticed one of your comments saying that you always use UV filters for protection, but after some tests you performed, you may not be using one for the 100-400. You said to stay tuned for your results, but I can’t find the post of that anywhere.
The filter I am using is a ProMaster Professional HGX Prime UV filter. It’s one of the more expensive ones, rivaling the top Hoya and B+H filters in price.
Not sure if you have any experience with the ProMaster HGX filters, but what are your thoughts on using one on the 100-400? I’m a bit of a pixel peeper, and I’m noticing that getting tack sharp images at longer focal lengths with this lens is proving to be challenging to say the least. Close focusing is superb. Not sure if it’s the filter causing an issue, the lens is defective, or my technique is at fault?
Appreciate any input you have, and thanks in advance!
Steve, not sure what you are referring to as far as me stating I might decide not to use a UV protector for the 100-400mm. If I wrote that, I must have been thinking I didn’t want any additional glass and that comment most likely was referring to the prototype 100-400mm I first used. Either way, I did decide to use a UV filter and have had one on for the past year and a half. My current favorite UV filters are the Hoya HD3’s. I get mine at Bozeman Camera here in my hometown of Bozeman, Montana. You can reach them at (406) 586-8300 or on the web at Bozeman Camera.