ND Filters for Landscape Photography

Posted May. 26th, 2023 by Daniel J. Cox

Photographing landscapes in the Faroe Islands is a challenge. Finding ways to create exciting images in dark, moody light is essential for a successful shoot. One of the tools I’ve come to appreciate are ND filters, which allow for very long exposures for landscape photography. Many photographers use this technique, but my recent shoot in the Faroe Islands was when I first tried it for myself.

Camera shutter speed sets the mood

One way to make a soft, ethereal, moody look, something we often refer to as silky water, is to use a very slow shutter speed. On many of my shoots with the ocean waves and a multitude of waterfalls, I was shooting anywhere from 1 to 60 seconds.

Leaving the shutter open for such a long time creates out-of-focus water that looks as if it’s running across the picture. It floats and dances in completely unpredictable ways. But that’s the beauty of using this technique for creating art.

The opposite of a slow shutter speed is one that will stop action. I’m personally not as much of a fan of this kind of image when compared to the longer shutter speeds. But there are those who appreciate the details that a fast shutter speed records. Using shutter speeds at least 1/500th of a second or higher is essential for capturing all the water droplets a wave might explode with.

Tricks of the trade

Capturing the silky water look usually requires darkening filters known as Neutral Density, or ND filters. There is now another option in the Olympus OM-1 that allows you to turn on ND filters within the camera body. Either way, to get these long exposures, it’s essential to cut down the light reaching the sensor, which will allow you to make longer than normal exposures. On a normal overcast day, it’s also possible to set a shutter speed slow enough to get silky water without any special filters.

No special filters were used. Shot at 1/10th of a second, ISO 80 at F/20

Above is an example of a waterfall and the surging tide shot at 1/10th of a second, ISO 80 at F/20. My ISO was as low as I could shoot on the OM-1 body, and the aperture was closed to its limit. These two factors gave me a shutter speed of 1/10th of a second, which was still slow enough to create a nice effect, just not as extreme as what you can get with ND filters.

In-camera ND filters

When I first heard about the built-in ND filters in the Olympus OM-1, I was skeptical. It wasn’t until my trip to the Faroe Islands that I decided to try it. And my goodness, was I happy that I did. From everything I can see I can’t tell any difference between the built-in filters and the neutral density filter screwed onto the lens. Both give a perfectly normal-looking silky water effect. The Olympus built-in filters give anywhere from 1 to 6 stops of reduced light.

Turning on the OM-1 in-camera ND filters

External screw on ND Filters

The other option I’ve also been using is the Lee Filters Big Stopper that attaches to the end of the lens. The Big Stopper is a square piece of optical plastic that fits into the Lee Filters holder. It’s rather large and a bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done.

Big Stopper was used, and no color correction was added

One thing I’ve noticed is the extreme color shift that is fixed relatively easily. But it’s there. I’ve not tried any other brand, so I’m not sure if this is indicative of all extreme ND filters. I simply make the color corrections within DxO PhotoLab when processing the images.

Processed image in DxO PhotoLab with color correction

This is a more traditional way of reducing light. You can also use a variable ND filter, which is a more traditional form factor that screws onto the end of the lens. It then has several different stops of light reduction.

That’s all folks

So that pretty much sums up my recent work with extreme ND filters. One of the great joys of photography is the ongoing learning. Life would be boring without taking on something new. Now go out and give these tools a try for yourself. Have fun!

Add Your Voice!
There are 3 comments on this post…
  1. Anette MossbacherOn Sep. 4th, 2023 (7 months ago)

    In the beginning of my first long-exposure journey I used the Lee Big Stopper as well and noticed the blue-ish in the images. By now, well, few years back, I went over to the Formatt Hitech Firecrest ND 3.0. No more blue-ish in the images at all. I am so glad I switched, and still sit on my Big Stopper from Lee. 😀 I should sell it, but should mention you need to correct the blue-ish in the images when using it. I love to set the exposure time to 4-8min, if possible for waterfalls, heavy waterfalls, I should mention. heavy means a lot of water comes down. As well when taking images of the sea/ocean with rocks I love to have a long exposure time for the effect, or is it, because I enjoy to watch the scenery and nature doing what they do… being amazing! I don’t now, I just love it. Landscape photography is a fulfilling task for me.

    PS The Little Stopper from Lee I still use as well.

    Cheers Anette

  2. Portrait of Carol Clark

    Carol ClarkOn May. 29th, 2023 (11 months ago)

    Many thanks, Dan, for your discussion of ND filters — and for showing the results from different shutter speeds.

    • Portrait of Daniel J. Cox

      Daniel J. CoxOn May. 29th, 2023 (11 months ago)

      Thanks Charyl. Glad you saw this. I was going to email you about this blog post since it was your comment on Facebook that gave me the idea to write something up. Glad you liked it. Miss seeing you in the field. Hope to see you again soon.

Add your voice to this conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In an effort to combat spam, your comment may be held for a brief moderation period.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

css.php