Adventures in Conservation and New Leica Lenses

Posted May. 16th, 2018 (2 weeks ago) by Daniel J. Cox

Mark and Dan Discuss Leica Lenses

This past weekend Mark Toal, Panasonic Lumix rep extraordinaire, stopped into Bozeman to discuss Adventures in Conservation and two new Leica lenses. Adventures in Conservation was the program I did for Bozeman Camera at the Museum of the Rockies on Friday, May 11th. I’ll share more of that story below, but first you may want to watch the video Mark and I shot about the new Leica 50-200mm and the recently released Leica 200mm F/2.8.

Spoiler Alert: Watch Dan rummage through Bozeman Camera’s big Nikon counter and pull out a Nikon 400mm F/2.8 to do a comparison in size and weight to the new Leica 200mm F/2.8 (400mm F/2.8 equivalent).

Mark shares with me, on camera, the brand new, soon to be released Leica 50-200mm as well as the recently released Leica 200mm F/2.8.  He had a pile of gear with him and many people stopped by Bozeman Camera on Saturday to take a look at some of the things Lumix has to offer.

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

Dan compares the Nikon 400mm F/2.8 and the new Leica 200mm F/2.8 at Bozeman Camera.

Big Sale on Leica and Lumix

An added bonus was a substantial sale on many of  the Leica lenses built specifically for the Lumix cameras. They’re taking a whopping $500 off the Leica 200mm F/2.8 and $200 off the Leica 12-60mm (my current favorite all around lens), $300 off the Leica 12mm F/1.4, and $400 off the Leica 43.5 (85mm equivalent) F/1.2, which is another fabulous lens. Finally, it’s $200 off another favorite of mine, the Leica 8-18mm. Additionally, I didn’t realize it, but there are also Trade In/Trade Up deals on the GH5, GH5S, and the brand new G9. Wow, some great opportunities to get into the MFT system if you’re tired of lugging around the monsters I used to carry.

All gear in this photo is available from all Lumix dealers including our friends at Bozeman Camera.

Friday Night’s Adventures in Conservation Program

My program Adventures in Conservation was a bit different than my typical programs. For a unique slant, I brought my friend, PBI biologist, Geoff York. Geoff and I worked in the field for a couple of bear capture seasons in Alaska. I was actually there when a semi-sedated female polar bear grabbed Geoff by the thigh, chomped down, then immediately fell back to sleep.

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

Dan and Geoff get a dual selfie in front of the crowd before the program at the Museum of the Rockies, Bozeman.

To say that was intimidating is an understatement. And… that was my first flight and first bear with the capture team ever. Geoff finished the job and then had things checked out at the local clinic. Despite being in the heart of polar bear territory, this was the clinic’s first ever bear bite.

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

Dan speaking to the crowd from the podium at the Museum of the Rockies. Bozeman, Montana

I remind him to tell that story when we do our talks together. Kind of fun bringing it up really. Hey, what are friends for😁 Not many can say they got chomped on by a polar bear and lived to talk about it.

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

Dan talking to one of a couple of young people who attended the program Adventures in Conservation. She wanted to know more about polar bears.

It was a great evening, just short of a full house with nearly 200 people in the seats. Much better than the program I gave at Huppins in Spokane, Washington where only two people showed up. Yep, two people and one was there just to talk to somebody from Panasonic about a broken camera. Very good for keeping your ego in check.

Below are a few more photos from our night at the Museum of the Rockies with Bozeman Camera.

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

Signs at the museum.

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

View from the audience. Adventures in Conservation.

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

Dan speaking to the audience at Adventures in Conservation. Bozeman, Montana

Leica Lenses Adventures in Conservation

The Bozeman Camera crew. Bozeman, Montana

A big slap on the back and thank you to Mark Toal for doing such a great job documenting the events at the Museum of the Rockies and Bozeman Camera. It’s so nice to get pictures from a real professional. Thank you Mark.

Add Your Voice!
There are 9 comments on this post…
  1. JohannesOn May. 21st, 2018 (5 days ago)


    I don’t know why, but these kind of “out of warranty repair problem” post are all over the web. I hope Panasonic will address this issue quickly. These kind of writings from unhappy Lumix customers could hurt their sales. This is not what I want as system users. I want to support this system and keep it alive. There is also time to each customer to come back and upgrade our lenses and cameras without any hesitation to the company.

    • Portrait of Daniel J. Cox

      Daniel J. CoxOn May. 25th, 2018 (19 hours ago)

      Johannes, all I can tell you is I’ve had very good luck with the 100-400mm. I’m attaching a screen shot of my Mylio catalog that shows I’ve shot 133454 images since I’ve owned it and not one has it given me any problem. There are always those that complain and the MFT forum on DPReview is the most caustic, negative community I’ve ever been a part of. Not sure why this group is so intent on producing such bad Karma.

  2. Dean SwartzOn May. 20th, 2018 (6 days ago)

    I’d like to add my experience with Panasonic’s tech service to this discussion. I simply loved my Panasonic Leica 42.5 f1.2 lens. It was absolutely fantastic. Then, after it was out of warranty, I updated the firmware. Sadly, the firmware file was somehow corrupted and my fantastic lens would only work at apertures from f1.2 to f4.0. From f4.0 and smaller, overexposure went from terrible to worse. I sent my lens to Panasonic’s USA service center. Diagnosis: lens is broken and cannot be fixed. I was offered a “refurbished” lens for $1,000 or I could pay to have the lens returned to Japan where it would be looked at again with no assurances that it could be repaired. (It has already cost me $150 plus shipping to have Panasonic USA look at it.) How I long for those 5-year Nikkor lens warranties.

    Let me be very clear: the service personnel were extremely pleasant and the lens was looked at immediately upon arriving at the facility. (I think this may have been in part because of Dan’s assistance through a friend of his.) But, a firmware update gone haywire after the warranty expiration should not result in destruction of an otherwise fantastic lens. [Note: I am selling the lens for 25% of what I paid for it . . . with full disclosure of its condition and history.] This is not what one would hope for from a “Leica” lens (or Lumix product).

    • Portrait of Daniel J. Cox

      Daniel J. CoxOn May. 20th, 2018 (6 days ago)

      Very disappointing to hear Dean. Not sure what to say other than I’m passing these comments on to the appropriate folks at Panasonic. thanks for the feedback.

  3. Rick PophamOn May. 19th, 2018 (7 days ago)

    Hi Dan,
    I started following your blog a short while ago and have been seriously thinking about giving the Lumix gear a try. I’m not new to micro 4/3, but have been using Olympus gear along with my Nikon system for the last couple of years. The Lumix G9 and especially the new 200/2.8 look VERY appealing.

    In my research on the Panasonic system I found some troubling reports about service: in particular the repairability of the Leica branded lenses post warranty — at least in North America. At first I ran across this on Lloyd Chambers’ blog (he really likes the Pana/Leica lenses):

    Roger Cicala’s (from comments were interesting, and the issue was probably best summed up in this thread from DPReview:

    The gist of the matter seems to be that if your Pana/Leica lens fails under warranty you are issued a refurbished lens, but if it fails AFTER warranty you are expected to buy the refurbished lens — there is apparently no option for a reasonable repair.

    The person who started the post had an excellent response from Panasonic, and Panasonic did issue a statement on the thread via DPReview, but their commitment to service remains unclear. What can we expect after the warranty runs out?

    I wonder if you could reach out to the Panasonic folks to clarify things.

  4. Mike GOn May. 17th, 2018 (1 week ago)

    Hi Dan, Is there somewhere that you have a calendar of upcoming speaking/presentation sessions?

    • Portrait of Daniel J. Cox

      Daniel J. CoxOn May. 17th, 2018 (1 week ago)

      The only place we keep up to date Mike is our Natural Exposures Facebook Fan Page. Give us a LIKE and you’ll get regular updates whenever I’m speaking somewhere. Thanks so much for the interest and joining the conversation here on the Blog

  5. Kent JakuszOn May. 16th, 2018 (1 week ago)

    Hi Dan,
    Nice article. The size difference between the 400 mm lenses is impressive. I would love to see a comparison in picture quality, pixel peeping, in a variety of lighting conditions.
    I am a big Lumix fan and don’t suspect the difference is noticeable especially when viewed via the internet.

    All the Best


    • Portrait of Daniel J. Cox

      Daniel J. CoxOn May. 17th, 2018 (1 week ago)

      Kent, I can guarantee you’ll never see the difference on an internet image as long as it’s posted at the typical size for internet use. I may try and do a comparison. We’ll see. Stay tuned.

Add your voice to this conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In an effort to combat spam, your comment may be held for a brief moderation period.

Natural Exposures, Inc.